论“应用写作”课程教学趣味性实施的策略   总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1  

张燕 《岳阳职业技术学院学报》2011,26(5):47-50

高职"应用写作"课程教学要摆脱因袭的历史观念,寻找各类文种与学生日常生活及职业发展的交集,建构适宜的以练为主的课堂教学模式  相似文献   

对我国少数民族学生汉语写作研究发展的调查和思考     

徐雪琴 《喀什师范学院学报》2015,(1)

考察和分析了1980-2012年间“中国期刊全文数据库”所刊载的中国少数民族学生汉语写作研究论文历时性发展进程,旨在了解当前国内对中国少数民族学生汉语写作相关研究的发展脉络、研究内容和特点,通过查漏补缺,为今后国内对少数民族学生汉语写作研究提供参考依据。  相似文献   

英语写作中语块使用的实证研究     

陈丹 《乐山师范学院学报》2015,(7)

提高英语写作技能是英语教学的目标之一,但怎样提高写作水平是英语教学亟待解决的难题。将语块理论引入写作教学,为其提供了新的视角。采用SPSS17．0对140名学习者在写作中使用语块的数据分析,发现其特征如下：从语块使用频度上看,语块使用较少,仅占全文的1/3;从语块使用重复率上看,其重复率较高,接近语块总数的1/3,这表明学习者语块使用不够多样化,种类不丰富;从语块类型上看,短语语块使用较多,句子语块使用较少;从学习者水平上看,高分组限制语块使用较多,低分组固定语块使用较多。  相似文献   

“大学写作”课程教学范式改革的路径分析     

徐汉晖 《教育教学论坛》2022,(3)

“大学写作”是汉语言文学专业的核心课,也是新闻学、小学语文教育等专业的必修课。由于“写作学”并未成为我国高等教育一个独立的学科,承担该课程的教师通常毕业于新闻学、文艺学或中国现当代文学等专业,由此导致非科班出身的教师在上专业性很强的“写作课”时,容易出现重理论讲授、轻技能训练等问题。其实,“大学写作”课本质上是一门富有挑战性的实践课,既需要创新性思维贯穿课堂,也需要实训练习穿插课堂,实践性和创意性应是其教学改革的范式方向。  相似文献   

Professional development for evidence-based SRSD writing instruction: Elevating fourth grade outcomes     

《Contemporary educational psychology》2023

Writing is a critical skill for success in all areas of life, but it is one of the least taught skills in school. Teachers consistently report being unprepared to teach writing. In this study, set in a Southern U.S. boomtown, teachers received two days of practice-based professional development for a ten-week implementation of self-regulated strategy development (SRSD), an evidence-based writing intervention, to support student persuasive and informational writing as well as performance on the state standardized writing exam. This multi-site cluster randomized controlled study evaluated the effectiveness of SRSD on student writing outcomes including prompt adherence, elements, and holistic quality. Multilevel modeling analysis was used to evaluate data from 418 fourth -grade students (256 treatment, 162 control) nested across 33 classes (n = 17 treatment taught by 8 departmentalized teachers; 16 control, 9 departmentalized teachers) within 11 schools randomly assigned to condition. Teachers implemented SRSD with high fidelity (M = 92%; range 91–100%). SRSD had a statistically significant and large effect on prompt adherence (p < .001; Hedges’ g = 1.87), elements (p < .001; Hedges’ g = 0.84) and holistic scores (p < .001; Hedges’ g = 0.87), while holding gender and pretest scores constant. Effects of SRSD on all writing measures were not significantly moderated by students’ gender, students’ pretest scores, or schools’ pretest scores. There were complications with teacher observations, especially related to technology. Limitations and future directions are discussed.  相似文献   

The bilateral benefits of providing and receiving peer feedback in academic writing across varying L2 proficiency     

《Studies in Educational Evaluation》2023

Although the effectiveness of peer review has been examined, few have tested the joint benefits of providing and receiving feedback features and quality in L2 contexts. The present study investigated variation in key features and quality of feedback provided and received by high and low L2 proficiency students and its benefits on revision in the authentic setting of students experiencing both roles of providing and receiving peer feedback in English academic writing. Analyses on two drafts from 50 students, 1356 idea units of anonymous implementable peer feedback and back-evaluation ratings revealed that the combined effect of providing and receiving feedback on revision was prominent for all students. But the bilateral benefits of providing and receiving feedback features were more significant for high proficiency students, while providing feedback features and quality benefited low proficiency students more. The study implies that students need more bilateral training with both providing and receiving feedback.  相似文献   

The influence of three approaches to feedback on L2 writing task improvement and subsequent learning     

《Studies in Educational Evaluation》2023

This research examined the effects of using rubrics, exemplars, and self-assessment as forms of feedback in an L2 writing development course in English with Chinese speakers. The sample consisted of 114 L2 students at a university in Macau. Participants were randomly assigned to treatment groups and provided feedback on an English writing task using either rubrics, exemplars, self-assessment, or a control condition. The efficacy of these treatments was examined for both performance (on the writing task at hand) and learning (as demonstrated by performance on a new, similar writing task). Results indicate that rubrics and exemplars were effective as compared to the control condition, but the self-assessment approach was not.  相似文献   

Model Catalysts from Single Crystal to Nanocrystals/Nano-Composites     

HUANG Weixin 《中国科学院院刊(英文版)》2014,(2)

<正>Heterogeneous catalysis is a key technology for chemical and materials synthesis,fuel production,power generation and conversion,and environmental remediation.To cope with resources(energy)shortage and environmental pollution,chemical processes should be not only effi cient but also clean,and catalysts must be active and selective.The innovation of such catalysts requires a fundamental understanding of the structure-activity relation of catalysts that can guide the design of catalyst structures.  相似文献   

Excel在体育成绩计算中的应用研究     

宋志超  姜伯乐 《体育科技文献通报》2014,(9):133-135

采用Excel软件来编制符合高校学生体育成绩计算的模板,用温州大学体育学院对公体学生体育成绩管理为示例,发现：1、运用常见的应用软件excel易于获取其它软件中的数据,节省输入数据时间。2、只需将公式复制到对应的信息单元格中,就可实现学生体育成绩的计算工作,修改简便易行,可反复使用。3、建立分块数据库大大方便了体育管理人员和体育教师计算体育成绩,特别是对开设选项课学校的体育成绩计算工作。  相似文献   

Interest in an expository text: How does it flow from reading to writing?   总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1  

Pietro Boscolo  Nicola AriasiLaura Del Favero  Chiara Ballarin 《Learning and Instruction》2011,21(3):467-480

This study investigated the flow of interest in a reading-to-write activity. It was hypothesized that (a) different contents in a text would stimulate different types of interest and (b) different writing tasks would impact differently students’ use of interesting text segments. Participants were 247 11th- and 12th-grade students, who were divided into 6 groups according to a 2 (interesting vs. uninteresting topic) × 3 (type of writing task) design. While reading, students rated novelty, curiosity, impressiveness, importance, and willingness to reflect on each text segment. Participants were then assigned to one of three writing tasks, namely argumentation, text designing, and composition. Results showed that concepts were regarded as important, events/activities as impressive, and evaluations as most worthy of reflection. Topic interest was explicitly expressed mainly in the argumentation condition, where increased topic interest scores after reading and writing were also found.  相似文献